The main thing
From October 12, 2010 came into force the change to the rules of the road which requires riders to wear a reflective jacket.
objective of the rule in the intention of the drafters is illuminated to make the driving hominid aware of the SUV he had just pulled a cyclist and not the usual stray dog.
Since the early days, the evidence seems to be that SUV owners are asking why lately the dogs wear reflective vests.
paradoxical corollary: the solution of (almost) all problems
The new law makes reference to a formal standard (EN 471:2008), which establishes the requirements that the jacket must meet. The first line of the preface to the rule in question reads:
"This European Standard provides a solution to solve the main problems."
Nientepopodimenoché! Luckily, limited: only the main, not all!
Corollary controversial
Given that the only sensible explanation for the introduction of this new law is that the writers believe blindly in the sentence above, I propose that from now to extend the law for the solution to all of all problems: Earthquake
Aquila? Obligation to jacket for Aquilani
Rubbish in Naples? Obligation to vest for the Neapolitans
chairman of the board and you are going to put you in prison? Forget the praise Alfano and put a nice jacket! (It 's the good time that rises in the ass!)
Note: anyone who wants to challenge my opinions indisputable, I must point out that the observation that the interventions made to date in L'Aquila and Naples have in fact more or less the same consistency as the jacket is not an argument for the same jacket.
