Moms Hairbrush Stories

For consistency

At the funeral of the seven cyclists killed by one of the many small balls with the cock and powerful cars that run on our roads will not be attended by representatives of that part of the company that owned the sucker Lamezia above.

And this is not because that part of society has somehow taken the defenses that his degenerate son, justified, as happens for example in the case of the Roman boy responsible for the death of a woman in a station Rome, whose arrest was opposed to the tones even violent people in the neighborhood dove viveva il ragazzo.

No, accade perché le forze dell'ordine di questo civile paese (intendo l'Italia), invece di operare per garantire a tutti il diritto a compatire, a sentire insieme il dolore di una comunità, hanno sconsigliato ad una parte della società di partecipare alle esequie per evitare tensioni. Tensioni razziali. Perché quella parte della società a cui apparteneva il coglione in questione è la comunità marocchina. Perché quella comunità, nella veglia di preghiera per le vittime, ha pregato Allah e non Dio. Cruciale differenza direi.

Per coerenza da oggi si disporrà che alle esequie di chi è malauguratamente incorso in una fine violenta sia sconsigliata la partecipazione any person related to ethnicity, religion, gender or geographical origin of what the person in charge: just boys at the funeral of women murdered by husbands or lovers, nothing baptized at the funeral of victims of mafia declared the Catholic faith, and charity no Italian is present at the funeral of the dead hand of some Italian.

And we will feel closer together and united in our grief.

Tranny Camila Rodriguez

Shameless

Wandering between sites of various associations of hunters looking for information about the dates for opening and closing of the hunting season, survey it is clear just to avoid making the end of the quail and the woods around by bike I came across the lovely countryside advertising you can find below, sponsored by Environment Sports Hunting Fishing (and already using the 's' to make the plural of a foreign word in an Italian context denotes the high level).

I swear before this level of idiocy and contempt of common sense, logic, decency and human intelligence (things but are obviously unknown to the proponents of the massacre in question) I struggle to find words that make my response appropriately.

I would say that by choosing life, I can think of a sacco di attività che non includono necessariamente il togliere la vita ad altri. E che nonostante io non vada a caccia, sembrerà strano agli autori della campagna, non mi drogo. O che siccome loro hanno scelto la vita, io non posso frequentare in bici i boschi per 4 mesi perché la rischierei, la vita che loro dicono di aver scelto.

Ora, sia chiaro, benché trovi che oggi la caccia sportiva sia una pratica di inutile crudeltà (e il fatto stesso che sia "sportiva", o che si sostenga che "la caccia debba essere garantita al pari di ogni altra attività del tempo libero", come recita il sito dell'associazione di cui sopra, paradossalmente segnano la misura di quanto abbia perso qualunque carattere di necessità that can somehow be justified), I'm not asking for the abolition of that-but I think that would be civil, but simply abandon it would be nice if the students do not presume to chastise even non-existent moral qualities to the fact that they get up at 6.30 to go and kill other living beings.

Thanks.

What Gentel Worts Can Cause

Brighter Than Thousand Sun


The main thing
From October 12, 2010 came into force the change to the rules of the road which requires riders to wear a reflective jacket.

objective of the rule in the intention of the drafters is illuminated to make the driving hominid aware of the SUV he had just pulled a cyclist and not the usual stray dog.

Since the early days, the evidence seems to be that SUV owners are asking why lately the dogs wear reflective vests.

paradoxical corollary: the solution of (almost) all problems
The new law makes reference to a formal standard (EN 471:2008), which establishes the requirements that the jacket must meet. The first line of the preface to the rule in question reads:

"This European Standard provides a solution to solve the main problems."

Nientepopodimenoché! Luckily, limited: only the main, not all!

Corollary controversial

Given that the only sensible explanation for the introduction of this new law is that the writers believe blindly in the sentence above, I propose that from now to extend the law for the solution to all of all problems: Earthquake

Aquila? Obligation to jacket for Aquilani

Rubbish in Naples? Obligation to vest for the Neapolitans

chairman of the board and you are going to put you in prison? Forget the praise Alfano and put a nice jacket! (It 's the good time that rises in the ass!)

Note: anyone who wants to challenge my opinions indisputable, I must point out that the observation that the interventions made to date in L'Aquila and Naples have in fact more or less the same consistency as the jacket is not an argument for the same jacket.